Aboitiz Power Case Analysis

How many people have you heard that said: “I wish I could have bought AP way back 2007 at P6”?


Instead of wishing something that will never happen (i.e. turning back time), let’s examine why AP increase from P6 to P35 and moved sideways from thereon so that through this analysis we will learn something that we can apply for future stock purchases.

The breakdown of our problem is:

  1. Why AP increased from P6 to P35 in 2007 to 2010?
  2. Why AP price moved sideways from thereon?

Why AP Increased From P6 to P35 in 2007 to 2010 and Traded Sideways Thereon?

In order to answer the problems, much insight can be derived from the following relationships:


Based on the charts presented above, the following can be observed:

  1. Capacity of AP’s power generation increased before price jumped from below P10 to P30’s level.
  2. The substantial increase in generation capacity was only reflected in the revenues of AP in 2010 thus the spike in the price in 2010.
  3. AP’s stock price is driven by the increase in revenues and EPS.
  4. The stock price moved sideways as generation capacity growth slowed down.

Power capacity drives the revenues of AP. Revenue growth in effect drives the EPS of AP. The increase of EPS places AP at an attractive valuation.


Therefore, power capacity is the foundation of AP’s value (and to other power generation companies).

Warren Buffett loves a company with good economic moat and a good management. Economic moat is the barrier for entry of competitors. The power generation industry has a natural barrier for entry of being capital intensive and the 3-year lead time before the completion of a power plant construction. The power shortage in the Philippines assured AP that the electricity capacity that it produces have ready buyers. Combined that with a management that can deliver what it promised, AP delivered a lot of shareholder value to its investors.


Disclaimer: I do not claim to be an expert and nothing I say should be taken as a recommendation to buy or sell. Read more in the ABOUT page.

Disclosure: No position

3 thoughts on “Aboitiz Power Case Analysis

  1. Hi Renzie,
    I am also convinced that this would happen to $TA and $FGEN in the future and I fear my impatience would tell me the same “wish” and regret not keeping FGEN and TA for long term because of short term gains 🙂

    Nice post!

  2. Yr 2007 – 2010 was a high growth period for stocks. Almost all stockholders are winners. It was a Bull. Buy and hold was the name of the game. Its good during long period of bull market. But it may not apply if the market is volatile. I rather buy on low, dip or correction and sell on high, rebound or spike out. Different strategy in every market.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s